William G. Faust Jr. is a resident of Dover.
I recently read a well-written article about security concerns at City Hall in Dover. Security should be the utmost consideration at all city buildings that serve the public.
As someone who attends a majority of City Council meetings, I have recently seen an increase in the number of attendees. For the most part, they have been vocal but professional about the problems they are addressing. Current hot topics have been gun violence and fatal shootings in Dover. These two issues are emotionally charged and are great worries for many Dover residents.
Security first starts with the mayor and council members when they hear concerns from residents. An attentive group, the body language of the mayor and councilpersons, and a true appearance of interest can go a long way in defusing an emotional situation. When citizens feel that their fears and frustrations are not being taken seriously by leaders, then anger starts to appear. Council members must refrain from using cellphones and computers or participating in any other activity that makes them appear inattentive during the public section forum of their meetings. In the past, some attendees have commented on perceived smirks on some representatives’ faces and other unflattering remarks or actions.
It is important to mention that there is security at these meetings, which does not cost taxpayers any additional funds. The chief of police or one of his officers are always present, usually in official uniform and armed. Secondly, the meetings are recorded. The only portion not videotaped is the public forum section. If it was, it would add another layer of security.
Improvement in security means additional funds need to be allocated on a yearly basis. Metal detectors and security wands are not cheap and require additional staff, maintenance and training. If more cameras, panic buttons or other safety devices are installed, you are looking at added revenue for their initial purchases and for general maintenance. With the budget being a major concern, the mayor and council must act wisely regarding any upgraded safety measures for those who enter the doors of City Hall.
I fully support making City Hall safe for all who visit or represent the citizens of Dover, however not at the cost of First Amendment rights. Security improvements should not infringe on attendees’ ability to speak at any council meeting that is open.
Our leaders must remember that City Hall is the citizens’ house, and Dover inhabitants should have input and know what is occurring to improve safety.
Remember: All the issues affecting the city, the mayor and council are in a fishbowl, and all their activities are being scrutinized. This is the time for them to stand up and be there for all city residents.
Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at civiltalk@iniusa.org.
