peel back effect

Speak Up: Response to ghost gun question, Round 3

Posted

A judge has barred the enforcement of a Delaware law banning the manufacture and possession of homemade, untraceable “ghost guns” in a lawsuit filed by gun rights advocates. Should ghost guns be legal? Why?

  • Ghost guns should be illegal for the obvious reasons. Guns should be registered. Owners should be licensed and insured. — Merv Sparks
  • Ghost hammers should be illegal for the obvious reasons. Hammers should be registered. Owners should be licensed and insured. Seem ridiculous? We agree — the government tracking personal property is ridiculous. — Libertarian Party of Delaware
  • How many hammers have killed people versus guns? Seems like a ridiculous question, right? — Merv Sparks
  • No, it seems close-minded. How many people would be killed by hammers in the absence of firearms? Those gun-control laws are working really well by the way. … Free people should have all of their rights, including the right to own any property they desire, without violating anyone else’s rights. — Libertarian Party of Delaware
  • Free people should be able to live without fear of being shot in a store, mall, school or anywhere. Your freedom of gun ownership stops where my freedom to live without fear of being shot starts. — Merv Sparks
  • It’s a constitutionally protected right. Feelings don’t trump the Bill of Rights. — Mark Schmalhofer
  • I’m not saying take away guns. Just register them like you do when you vote. You have the right to vote, but we still need to confirm who you are. — Merv Sparks
  • Read the Second Amendment. Read the judge’s decisions and statements (federal/state) on these unconstitutional laws. — Denise Clendenning
  • The Second Amendment mentions ghost guns? — Merv Sparks
Members and subscribers make this story possible.
You can help support non-partisan, community journalism.

x
X