A judge has barred the enforcement of a Delaware law banning the manufacture and possession of homemade, untraceable “ghost guns” in a lawsuit filed by gun rights advocates. Should ghost guns be legal? Why?
If something is untraceable, how can one restrict it? — Sonya Sansbury Dyer
It’s illegal to not have a license plate for a reason. This is no different. — Jaden Blondin
Having a car without a tag isn’t a constitutionally protected right. — Mark Schmalhofer
Where in the Constitution are untraceable guns mentioned? — Jaden Blondin
Are traceable guns found in the Constitution? — Mark Schmalhofer
I think you’re missing the point. — Jaden Blondin
How many traceable guns existed when the Constitution was written? — Jon Walczak
Second Amendment. That is all that matters. Shall not be infringed! It’s really clear-cut. — Shawn McGrath
I know that the U.S. government shouldn’t give billions in weapons to our enemies. That’s more of a concern than regular Joe owning a ghost gun. — Jamie Cubeta
The only reason to have an untraceable gun is to do something illegal. It’s not for self-defense, hunting or target practice. It’s to commit a crime. — John Gemma
The vast majority of violent criminals don’t use so-called homemade firearms. — Mark Schmalhofer
If you have the finances to make a “ghost gun,” you don’t need to commit crimes with it. They aren’t cheap. — Lisa Bell
The problem isn’t guns. — Ken Kirk
You are wrong. Guns are absolutely part of the problem. Guns in the wrong hands is the problem. — Rick Reed
Guns don’t discharge without a human being causing them to. — Mark Schmalhofer
Criminals don’t obey gun laws, and gun crime is only a symptom of a much larger issue. — Steven Pritchard
