Daniel Pritchett is a resident of Dover.
I wrote just before the inauguration of our 47th president that I was very worried — even fearful — about what his occupying that office might portend (“Be very afraid as presidents transition”). Since then, it is clear that my concerns were more than justified. We now have:
In 1792, Alexander Hamilton wrote a remarkable letter to George Washington, in which he expressed worry about the potential threat from a future occupant of the presidency, who would not have the sterling character of our first: “When a man unprincipled in private life desperate in his fortune, bold in his temper, possessed of considerable talents, having the advantage of military habits — despotic in his ordinary demeanour — known to have scoffed in private at the principles of liberty — when such a man is seen to mount the hobby horse of popularity — to join in the cry of danger to liberty — to take every opportunity of embarrassing the General Government & bringing it under suspicion — to flatter and fall in with all the non sense of the zealots of the day — It may justly be suspected that his object is to throw things into confusion that he may ‘ride the storm and direct the whirlwind.’”
In 1838, in his first major public address, 29-year-old Abraham Lincoln asserted that the only real danger to our country, its constitutional system and its political institutions would not come from abroad but from within, from the American people themselves: “If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.” He said that it would erupt from “the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country, the growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions in lieu of the sober judgment of courts.” He urged that “reverence for the laws” become the “political religion of the nation.”
Lincoln, whose political character was as sterling as that of Washington himself, also warned his audience about the possibility that a dangerous man “of ambition and talents” might arise and “seek the gratification of their ruling passion.” If and when that happened, Lincoln said, “it will require the people to be united with each other, attached to the government and laws, and generally intelligent, to successfully frustrate his designs.”
I believe that we, the American people, are facing the greatest challenge to our constitutional system of government since the one Mr. Lincoln faced in 1861. Unless we rise to the occasion, we will lose our greatest birthright as American citizens: the privilege of living in a free country where our rights as human beings are protected by our government, instead of being subjects of that government. That was the founding principle of the United States in 1776, but as we approach the 250th anniversary of that event, we are in danger of having nothing to celebrate. As Lincoln put it in 1838, “As a nation of free men, we must live for all time or die by suicide.”
To avoid that, it will, as he said, “require the people to be united with each other, attached to the government and the laws,” and firm in standing up for our republic against anyone who wants to destroy it.
Perhaps we can also recall — for inspiration — the words of another great lover of liberty, Franklin Delano Roosevelt: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”
Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at civiltalk@iniusa.org.