As the mother of four bright and contributing grown children (science teacher, nurse, Air Force Judge Advocate General attorney, art teacher), it is disheartening to read commentaries like “Lawmakers should defend, advance reproductive rights” (Delaware State News, April 4) because they never mention any “rights” of those “still-in-the-womb” girls and boys who did not ask to be conceived, yet once “here,” have no voice in the decision about whether they will have the right to life or not. Ironically, that decision is made instead by someone who was given the “right to life.”
Of course, there are many aspects to the subject of human life and its beginning and end, but to me, a discussion specifically about right to life and abortion should start with the scientifically proven fact of when human life begins (yes, I personally believe it begins “at conception”), and at the same time, that discussion should also be based on a sentiment of true love for that tiniest of human life, a love like that we have for our own life.
Regarding the many other issues involved in such a discussion, I received an email today from Star Parker of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education (CURE), in which this dynamic Black woman, who has herself experienced abortion, states: “The abortion industry is targeting communities of color — and the proof is in how Planned Parenthood strategically positions their surgical abortion facilities” in areas near African American and/or Hispanic communities. She provides statistics to support that statement.
And yes, as a senior citizen, I understand that life has difficult times — some much more than others —but I still am glad that my Mexican mother, although living in poverty in an Indiana home with no electricity or plumbing, did not abort me, and I hope my life has made a positive contribution. I would like others to have the same opportunity of “the right to life” and the same opportunity to “make a contribution.”
Karen Smiga
Frederica
