In 1976, the late Jimmy Carter set an example of ethical governance by placing his family-owned peanut farm into a blind trust before taking office. This gesture underscored Carter’s commitment to avoiding conflicts of interest and maintaining public trust. Unfortunately, here in Salisbury, Mayor Randy Taylor disregards these principles of transparency and public service.
Despite being in office for over a year, Mayor Taylor has failed to take measures to separate his personal business interests from his responsibilities as a public servant. Not only did he choose not to sell his multiple properties in City limits or place them in a blind trust, but he recently vetoed the Density Amendment, a measure designed to address Salisbury’s critical housing crisis despite a glaring conflict of interest. As a landlord and property owner in Downtown Salisbury, Mayor Taylor stands to directly benefit from stifling competition that the amendment’s increased housing density would create.
Adding to the ethical concerns is the fact that Mayor Taylor’s political decisions is also influenced by his campaign contributors. According to public records, Taylor has accepted over $1,000 in campaign contributions from prominent opponents of the Density Amendment—many of whom are also landlords. These donors include:
Carolyn A. Wohlgemuth: $200
John S. Wohlgemuth: $200
Michael C. Weisner: $250 (Max donation)
Stacey L. Weisner: $250 (Max donation)
Lynne Pollitt Bratten: $250 (Max donation)
By vetoing the Density Amendment, Mayor Taylor is protecting his interests and those of his donors rather than prioritizing the needs of Salisbury residents. Working families in our city have long advocated for more housing options and relief from skyrocketing rents. The Density Amendment represented a significant step toward addressing these demands. Still, Mayor Taylor’s veto is a blatant misuse of public office to safeguard his financial interests and appease influential campaign backers.
Elected Officials have a duty to act in the best interests of their constituents, not their own wallets. Mayor Taylor’s actions reflect a troubling lack of ethical leadership. Why didn’t he take steps to eliminate potential conflicts of interest when he assumed office? Why did he continue to accept donations from individuals whose financial interests align with his own?
This situation underscores the urgent need for accountability and ethical governance in Salisbury. The City Council must act decisively to overturn Mayor Taylor’s veto of the Density Amendment. Our leaders should stand with the struggling residents to find affordable housing, not with those who prioritize profit over public good. Overturning this veto would send a clear message: Salisbury values fairness, transparency, and the needs of its people over personal and political gain.
Jared Schablein
Salisbury resident
Reader reactions, pro or con, are welcomed at civiltalk@iniusa.org.